Ringo Starr - Liverpool 8
|
List Price: Our Price: $7.92 You Save: $11.06 (58%) Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $2.75 (click here) Category: Music CD See more new music releases 
|
|---|
Buy this Music CD at online store in your country
Canadian Music Store
Canadian Music Store
Free Music Notes for Liverpool 8
Free Music Review: Ringo changes the sound a bit
Hit: 3 Stars
The 2009 album from Ringo Starr, entitled 'Liverpool 8' and finds hime in familiar territory with songs about his days with the Beatles and about 'Peace and Love'. On the surface it seems like a continuation from albums like 'Ringo Rama' and 'Choose Love', with the Beatles imitating backing vocal group and the pop-rock stylings. However, a closer look and Ringo tries to break out from the sound of the last few albums. Well that's fine because if he made another album that sounded exactly like 'Ringo Rama', 'Vertical Man' or 'Choose Love' people might have started saying he's stuck too long to the same formula.
In Fact, Ringo seems to have made the first half of the album sound like his more recent albums, while the second half tries to go back to his seventies sound. The sound here is noticably more 'synthetic' than the previous few albums at times. Tracks in the second half of the album like 'Pasodobles', 'Love Is', 'Harry's song' and 'R U Ready' (the last one complete with fake 70's vinyl sound) are more stripped down folky songs that wouldn't sound out of place on "Goodnight Vienna" or "Ringo". The songs are all fairly catchy and there's a nice variety of style.
Overall it's quite pleasing, albeit uneven, due to producer changes and stuff. The album made it fairly high on the Billboard charts and could have wide appeal because it's quite diverse but also may miff some people because of it's drastic style changes and it's a big shift, in some ways, from his Mark Hudson albums, but it's still a catchy and enjoyable listen.
Free Music Review: Ringo Starr
Hit: 3 Stars
Ringo Starr- Liverpool 8
There's a brand new studio album from legendary artist Ringo Starr, entitled Liverpool 8 it features 12 new tracks written and produced by Ringo Starr and Dave Stewart.
And if you are a "diehard, less discriminating, I only care a former Beatle wrote and sung this", fan you may be able to wade through the murky lyrics and push your way through a dozen songs that buck against continuity and any sort of musical framework. However, don't place any strong bets on Liverpool 8 just yet.
Granted, Ringo has never been known as a lyrical genius or even a credible vocalist, so potentially to expect anything more than treacle may be the wrong way to go with Starr. As a drummer, he is certainly solid if a bit unimaginative and if only listening for that aspect, Liverpool 8 is a good enough showcase for the legendary drummer. Still, one would hope that after 50+ years Starr could eek out 12 songs that don't stay firmly tethered in mediocrity ..unfortunately Starr phoned this cd in and the result is a disappointing and egocentric trip through a myriad of insipid songs that are not even saved by Stewart's production.
- Kim Thore, All Access Magazine
Free Music Review: Liverpool 8
Hit: 3 Stars
Liverpool 8 being Ringo Starr's 14th studio album and 2005 release and is straight forward rock album. Liverpool being the first track is an homage to his Beatles past and talks about all the places they played but on the whole the track itself is very mediocre and could have been much better. The rest of the album has this generic feel to it. Lyrics that one has heard so many times before and a sound that is 100% generic rock music. The booklet has no lyrics and one photograph of Ringo/Richard himself. It also contains a list of whom plays what for each track which is quite nice. Allmusic gave it 3/5 and The Times 2/5. I wish I could give it 2.5 but since I can not then it gets a 3. 3/5.Free Music Review: Liverpool8
Hit: 3 Stars
This collection of music is a little boring, but I love Ringo and the band is really good, so I'll keep playing it.Free Music Review: Ringo's second autumn, or: History Repeating?
Hit: 2 Stars
Let me start this review by saying I am a huge Ringo fan, lest any doubts arise. But 5-star reviews of this record -- especially by fans so giddy at its release that they didn't even listen to the record before writing the review -- miss the point. This is not a "great" record.
Ringo's career has interesting parallels. 30+ years ago, his greatest record, "Ringo", set a benchmark for what he can do, given the right conditions. He was up, he had the right people with him, they were ready to roll, and they created a classic. That record was followed by "Goodnight Vienna", which tried to imitate the formula for success defined by its predecessor, but was just a bit too... whatever, too much or too little, depending on how you looked at it. It seemed like they thought it would be easy to make a "Ringo 2", but it turned out they were wrong. It was overproduced and underproduced, overwritten and underwritten; too little effort was expended to make it great. Its high points were as high as "Ringo", but there were less of them, and the rest wasn't nearly as good.
The next record, "Rotogravure" (1976), again had most of the ingredients for success, yet, though it steered fairly clear of the low points, it had no real high points left. It was a too-lazy or too-misunderstood attempt to re-create "Ringo", and after hearing it, one could conclude that the only really stellar moment, the intro to the first song (!), was over in about 10 seconds. The rest was good, but not great in any way, and Ringo's career went down the drain, fully and completely, with the next release, "Ringo the 4th", the nadir.
Is history repeating itself? After cleaning himself up in the late-'80s, Ringo released a string of enjoyable, quality records, and his 2003 release, "Ringo Rama", was very exciting indeed. Firstly in that, as his best record since "Ringo", every single song was good, his playing and singing were better than anyone would have expected, and he was obviously having fun. But the exciting part was it was achieved as part of an upward curve -- it led many to think that Ringo had now finally "arrived". He, his co-writer and producer friend Mark Hudson, and his band (the Roundheads) just seemed to fire on all cylinders. He was realizing his potential, and the future looked very bright.
The 2005 follow-up, "Choose Love", had (like "Vienna" in 1974) some very bright spots, equal to anything on "Ringo Rama" -- for example, "Some People", the Chrissie Hynde duet "Don't Hang Up", and the title track -- but most of the rest was unremarkable, and it was often overproduced to the hilt, while Ringo's playing and vocals were not up to "Rama" standards. Indeed, many of the poorer tracks on "Choose Love" were actually worse than the 3 bonus tracks from the expanded edition of "Ringo Rama", all of which were excellent and had actually been cut from that album!
For me, the parallels continue with "Liverpool 8". This record shows that the formula that seemed so promising isn't working any longer. Though most of the songs are "good enough", there is only one truly stellar moment on the album, the opening (title) track. Interestingly, it is the only track not co-written with deposed producer Mark Hudson or the Roundheads, but rather with Dave Stewart, Ringo's new "accomplice". A couple of the other songs are also quite good as album tracks, but it seems the record also uses a lot of "gimmicks" to replace what, just two albums ago, wouldn't have been necessary: good writing, arranging, playing, or singing. And there are just too many weaknesses to overlook.
Examples? Re. writing, the song "Tuff Love", which has an upbeat message, drudges along with a negative-sounding melody line that seems to contradict the lyrics. His obligatory mention of "It Don't Come Easy" seems very contrived indeed as stuck into the otherwise engaging "Gone Are the Days." On an otherwise enjoyable tribute to Harry Nilsson, "Harry's Song", the refrain just doesn't seem to want to get off the ground, begging for one more writing session to finish it. And even the very respectable, fun, sing-along song "Liverpool 8" is musically over-repetetive at times -- and wouldn't the final line, "But I never let you down", have sounded more positive, less conceited, and more pro-Liverpool if it had just been changed to "But *you* never let *me* down," at least once in the song?
Arranging/production: "Give It a Try", a pleasant and well-played song, breaks suddenly into a hectic (and poorly sung) middle eight that just ruins the whole relaxed atmosphere of the song, leaving a bitter taste. The miking/mixing (and playing) of the drums in "Harry's Song", a light and enjoyable song, is at times far too heavy-sounding; Ringo and his producers should have given "When I'm 64" a listen to remember how brushes should be recorded (and played). And what kind of gimmick is the drum-oriented "For Love", with mediocre singing and a stilted beat that can't hide the song's inherent weakness? It ain't no "Back Off Boogaloo"!
Singing: I already mentioned the middle eight of "Give It a Try"; Ringo is audibly "reaching for it", but not getting there - it's grating, and it shows a lack of effort to get it right. The otherwise punchy and effective "If It's Love That You Want" is also spoiled by strained vocals. We all know Ringo isn't the greatest singer, but again: On "Ringo" and on "Ringo Rama", he and his producer succeeded in getting it right nevertheless. This smacks of laziness.
Playing: The sharp and effective playing shown on "Ringo Rama" is still present here on some songs, but there are some messy bits, too, that are more typical of the ex-Beatle Ringo; too often in his solo career, he settles for less than enough. He can be an excellent player (indeed, there are great bits of playing on this record, like the title track), but he can also be excruciatingly lazy or sloppy.
But I should mention the bright spots as well. Besides the title track, there are the swinging, and even kinda funky "Now That She's Gone Away", a track worthy of any Ringo record; "Pasodobles", a wonderful, slow love song about dancing (albeit to a rumba rhythm!), also very good; and the country-and-western "R U Ready", with its gospel/Harrison-esque lyric that ranks amongst the best lyrics ever on a Ringo record, and which might even have felt at home on the "O Brother Where Art Thou" soundtrack if you overlook the bizarre production aspects in the middle of the song.
Also worthy of a mention are the poppy "If It's Love That You Want", which is fun if you overlook stints of strained singing; the light and airy "Harry's Song", which, despite my various criticisms above, is actually quite nice; and "Love Is", with Lennon-esque guitar picking and a typical Ringo lyric about the positive aspects of love.
(If you combine these with the best of "Choose Love", you would have one very nice album!)
All in all, a "good" record but one with too few moments that shine out and demand to be seen (or heard), and one with too many weaknesses to be "great". My rating: 2-1/2 stars. Hopefully, the next record will deliver what the Starkey/Stewart title track seems to be promising, and history will not repeat itself with some sort of "Ringo Rama the 4th".